Saturday, December 8, 2007

Weekly Analysis #5 The Forensic Formula


The television show CSI has inspired an entire new generation of one-hour murder/mystery television shows, as after it first appeared back in 2000, there were many more shows with the same exact formula that followed soon after. There is now a CSI Miami, CSI NY, Cold Case and Bones are just a few of the copycat shows that followed in the footsteps of the original CSI. People have long seemed curious as to how murders were able to be solved, these shows, while not real, do provide a realistic depiction of how detectives are able to solve a seemingly, unsolvable case.
I decided to write about the formulas that go along with every crime scene investigation show, whether it is fictional or non-fictional, they all seem to have the same outcome in the end. I really do not watch the fictional shows nearly as much as the non-fictional shows, such as; Forensic Files and Snapped, however, it seems to be pretty clear that they operate with pretty much the same concept. That of the criminal would not have been able to get away with their crime, had it not been for the benefits of forensic science and the genius detectives that were able to solve the case.
The formula is; starting out with the actual horrific crime, detectives investigate the crime scene, they round up the potential suspects for questioning, one of which always seems to be a bit odd and does not have a solid alibi for their whereabouts the time that the crime was committed, however, they do not have any concrete evidence against him/her, the case usually at that point goes cold as they run out of leads and potential suspects. But wait a minute, here come the forensic detectives with a new shred of evidence barely visible to the naked eye; however, given to a forensic scientist, and running all of the necessary tests on this micro-fiber, they are able to determine that one of the suspects could be tied to being at the scene of the murder around the time when it was committed.
These shows usually end up in the perpetrator confessing to the crime when they are presented with the forensic evidence or if it does go to trial that little shred of evidence is referred to as the smoking gun that solved the case. Everyone that was involved with the case at this point, at least on the non-fictional shows, praises the ability of forensic science and how without it, they would have never have been able to solve the case. I always think of the old Scooby Doo episodes when I was a kid, at the end of every episode, when they would catch the criminal, they would rip off his mask, everyone would gasp at who it was, and the criminal would say, “And I would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn’t been for you meddling kids!” I really do enjoy these shows and do not mean to appear that I am trivializing them, I think that it is great that there is such a thing as forensic science that helps to catch murderers and criminals, I just always find it comical that almost every episode follows the exact same formula.

Saturday, December 1, 2007

Weekly Analysis #4 Athletes and Trouble with the Law





Many people idolize professional athletes, their fame, fortune, lifestyle, and sense of invincibility; all contribute to the public’s idolization of these figures. Unfortunately, these same characteristics often lead to trouble for young athletes who obtain all of this power and fame at such an early age. Many athletes often find themselves on the wrong side of the law due to carrying concealed weapons, drug possession, getting into fights, dog fighting, steroids, and in some cases, even being accused of rape.

These same athletes should have some sense of a moral obligation to realize that people, especially children, look up to them as heroes. It seems as though a week cannot go by without the public having to hear about another athlete that find themselves in some sort of trouble. Over the past few years, we have seen some very famous athletes that have been in legal predicaments, including; Kobe Bryant (accused of rape, however; charges were dropped), Barry Bonds (numerous steroid accusations and now has a federal perjury charge pending against him), Adam “Pac-Man” Jones (been involved in numerous incidents, including; playing a role in a night club bouncer being shot and paralyzed), and Michael Vick (currently serving prison time for his role in a dog-fighting ring). The biggest problem seems to be the gun-toting athletes. Luke Scott, a pitcher for the Houston Astros, “estimates that as many as 20 percent of Major League Baseball players carry concealed weapons, and more than 50 percent own some type of gun. A bodyguard for NBA players, estimates that close to 60 percent of basketball players carry a gun and Jabar Gaffney, a wide receiver for the New England Patriots, thinks that 90 percent of NFL players have firearms. (Berko, Delsohn, Rovegno, 2006) These are only a few examples of “so-called” heroes and the problems that they represent in our society.

This is definitely not to say that all athletes are bad people and that some of them are not deserving of the heroic status, however; the media seems to focus much more on the negative than the positive, after all, negativity sells newspapers and gets ratings. You will very seldom hear about athletes like Warrick Dunn, a running back for the Atlanta Falcons, who every year purchases a brand new home for an underprivileged single mother in the Atlanta region. Dunn is truly a hero for everyone to look up to and admire.

Athletes, whether they want to be or not, are role models and serve as heroes to many people. They can play a significant role in the psyche of a child, we can only hope and wish that they start to realize the seriousness and consequences that their actions carry.

References
Berko, S., Delsohn, S., & Rovegno, L. (2006) Athletes and guns. ESPN Outside the lines. Retrieved November 30th, 2007, from http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?id=2691043